| Background
Classical economic theory envisions a system where firms
fiercely compete with each other for resources, marketshare
and profits, and while doing so, guard their knowledge
and processes closely from the prying eyes of their
business rivals. However, with the advent of e-business,
that scenario is surely and swiftly changing. Giant
manufacturing companies around the world are continuing
to compete with each other head to head, but at the
same time they are partnering each other and working
side by side to create new products, share ideas, and
technologies, while sharing the costs.
Innovation
Based Economy
This paradigm shift in the rules of the game, is because
of the sharp emphasis on innovation for sheer survival.
In this increasingly globalized world, manufacturers
are compelled to seek partnerships among their competitors,
so as to cut costs which would have been inconceivable
even a decade ago. "Competitiors can share costs
on projects that they individually could not afford
and they can do this without hurting their competitive
advantage", says Mike Arnold, President of Timken
Corp.'s Industrial Group, which is collaborating with
its rivals, such as bearing manufacturer SKF, to share
logistics and e-business activities. Thus while on the
one hand these firms are bitter business rivals in the
market place, and would cheerfully steal each others
customers or come up with a better technology or improved
design, they have no hesitation in striking partnerships
, where going it alone may not be the best approach.
Partnerships
in The Automobile Industry
Nowhere are these collaborations more in evidence than
in the automobile industry, which is being spurred by
the need to cut costs. "New hybrid systems are
especially costly to bring to market and require high
development costs" says Eric Ridenour, Executive
Vice President for product development at Chrysler,
the automobile manufacturer. He says that the company's
goal is to find efficiencies in such areas as engineering,
working with suppliers to develop and purchase components
and in purchasing manufacturing equipment.
Much the same views are echoed by James Champy, business
transformation expert, best selling author and Chairman
of consulting practice at Perot Systems. "With
the tremendous cost pressures they face, companies simply
can't afford to design and build all the components
on their own. When you are designing a new engine, the
only way to get efficiencies is to collaborate with
your competitor", he says.
Factors
Influencing Collaboration
Besides cost sharing, sometimes the sheer complexity
of the product requires the participation of more than
one manufacturer, as is often the case in the defence
and aerospace industry. For instance, Northrop Grumann
is collaborating with BAE North America to develop an
integrated microwave assembly for a joint strike fighter.
The challenge of getting a new product to market quickly
is another factor influencing collaboration. Both General
Motors and Daimler-Chrysler were eyeing separately the
fledgling but fast growing market for hybrid gas-electric
automobiles. Both companies faced stiff competition
from the market leaders Toyota and Honda and were anxious
to bring a comprehensive hybrid technology to market
well in time. What could be more natural than for them
to collaborate through sharing of developmental costs
and pooling of brain power.
Commonality of goals is not essential for a successful
collaboration. A case in point is the twenty-year long
collaboration between Toyota and General Motors in California
USA. While GM wanted to learn the secrets of Japanese
lean manufacturing methods, Toyota wanted a manufacturing
beachhead to build cars in the US. Thus despite such
a wide dissimilarity of goals, the collaboration has
succeeded resoundingly and Toyota now operates 13 plants
in North America with an annual production of 1.5 million
vehicles.
While competitors may not always hope to get the same
benefits from an alliance, some of the other factors
favouring such collaborations are access to each others
technological and design resources, and leveraging the
engineering talents available in both the organizations.
Similarly, joint component or assembly development projects
often provide economies of scale when ordering parts
from suppliers. Such collaborations create their own
synergies for the mutual benefit of the collaborating
organisations.
As globalization picks up around the world, the advantages
of such alliances will be seen to far exceed the disadvantages
if any, and they will become an increasingly common
feature of the manufacturing scene. |